Sat, Jun 7, 2025
[Archive]
.png)
1- Environmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
2- Students Research Committee, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
3- Students Research Committee, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
4- Students Research Committee, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
2- Students Research Committee, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
3- Students Research Committee, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
4- Students Research Committee, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Abstract: (128 Views)
Background: Face masks are part of personal protective equipment with the majority being disposable and primarily made of plastic materials. The widespread disposal of these masks in the environment has resulted in the accumulation of thousands of tons of contaminated waste, posing significant environmental, social, and waste management challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the production, consumption, and subsequent disposal of face masks, thereby exacerbating these issues. This study aims to assess the environmental impacts associated with face mask use and to explore strategies for their mitigation.
Methods: Relevant data were gathered from scientific databases including ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to explore sustainable solutions for mitigating face mask-related pollution. The study examined face mask structure, types, performance, filtration efficiency, plastic pollution, ecological changes, and waste management methods to address environmental issues.
Results: The findings highlight the structural components and types of facemasks commonly used, particularly in medical settings, and their subsequent environmental implications. Disposable face masks have been found to contain harmful compounds, including heavy metals, and contribute to global warming. Waste management methods such as landfilling, incineration, recycling, and reuse are commonly employed, though each has limitations. The adaption of biodegradable mask alternatives is proposed to reduce the release of microplastic consumption and greenhouse gases into the environment.
Conclusion: This review contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the environmental burden of face mask waste and presents potential mitigation strategies. By evaluating various aspects of face mask pollution and disposal, the study supports the development of context-specific waste management practices to prevent environmental contamination.
Methods: Relevant data were gathered from scientific databases including ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to explore sustainable solutions for mitigating face mask-related pollution. The study examined face mask structure, types, performance, filtration efficiency, plastic pollution, ecological changes, and waste management methods to address environmental issues.
Results: The findings highlight the structural components and types of facemasks commonly used, particularly in medical settings, and their subsequent environmental implications. Disposable face masks have been found to contain harmful compounds, including heavy metals, and contribute to global warming. Waste management methods such as landfilling, incineration, recycling, and reuse are commonly employed, though each has limitations. The adaption of biodegradable mask alternatives is proposed to reduce the release of microplastic consumption and greenhouse gases into the environment.
Conclusion: This review contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the environmental burden of face mask waste and presents potential mitigation strategies. By evaluating various aspects of face mask pollution and disposal, the study supports the development of context-specific waste management practices to prevent environmental contamination.
Type of Study: Review Article |
Subject:
Environmental Health, Sciences, and Engineering
Received: 2025/03/1 | Accepted: 2025/04/29
Received: 2025/03/1 | Accepted: 2025/04/29
References
1. Abbasi, S. A., Khalil, A. B., & Arslan, M. (2020). Extensive use of face masks during COVID-19 pandemic: (micro-) plastic pollution and potential health concerns in the Arabian Peninsula. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 27(12), 3181-3186. [Crossref]
2. Alcaraz, J. P., Le Coq, L., Pourchez, J., Thomas, D., Chazelet, S., Boudry, I., . . . & Landelle, C. (2022). Reuse of medical face masks in domestic and community settings without sacrificing safety: Ecological and economical lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic. Chemosphere, 288, 132364. [Crossref]
3. Allison, A. L., Ambrose-Dempster, E., Aparsi, T. D., Bawn, M., Casas Arredondo, M., Chau, C., . . . & Ward, J. (2020). The environmental dangers of employing single-use face masks as part of a COVID-19 exit strategy. UCL Open: Environment Preprint. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10098876/1/Miodownik_Covid19-Masks-Journal-paper.submitted_redacted.pdf [Crossref]
4. Canopoli, L., Coulon, F., & Wagland, S. T. (2020). Degradation of excavated polyethylene and polypropylene waste from landfill. Science of the Total Environment, 698, 134125. [Crossref]
5. Chellamani, K., Veerasubramanian, D., & Balaji, R. V. (2013). Surgical face masks: Manufacturing methods and classification. Journal of Academia and Industrial Research, 2(6), 320-324.
6. de Albuquerque, F. P., Dhadwal, M., Dastyar, W., Azizi, S. M. M., Karidio, I., Zaman, H., & Dhar, B. R. (2021). Fate of disposable face masks in high-solids anaerobic digestion: Experimental observations and review of potential environmental implications. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 3, 100082. [Crossref]
7. de Sousa, F. D. B. (2020). Pros and cons of plastic during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recycling, 5(4), 27. [Crossref]
8. Fadare, O. O., & Okoffo, E. D. (2020). Covid-19 face masks: A potential source of microplastic fibers in the environment. Science of the Total Environment, 737, 140279. [Crossref]
9. Hamidianfar, N., Chamani, A., Ataabadi, M., & Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi, R. (2025). Uptake of potentially toxic elements in microplastic-contaminated soils: A controlled laboratory study using Eisenia Fetida. Journal of Human Environment and Health Promotion, 11(1), 27-35. [Crossref]
10. Haque, M. S., Uddin, S., Sayem, S. M., & Mohib, K. M. (2021). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) induced waste scenario: A short overview. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(1), 104660. [Crossref]
11. Hasan, M., Islam, A. R. M. T., Jion, M. M. M. F., Rahman, M. N., Peu, S. D., Das, A., . . . & Malafaia, G. (2023). RETRACTED: Personal protective equipment-derived pollution during Covid-19 era: A critical review of ecotoxicology impacts, intervention strategies, and future challenges. Science of the Total Environment, 887, 164164. [Crossref]
12. Khoo, K. S., Ho, L. Y., Lim, H. R., Leong, H. Y., & Chew, K. W. (2021). Plastic waste associated with the COVID-19 pandemic: Crisis or opportunity? Journal of Hazardous Materials, 417, 126108. [Crossref]
13. Klemeš, J. J., Van Fan, Y., & Jiang, P. (2020). The energy and environmental footprints of COVID-19 fighting measures-PPE, disinfection, supply chains. Energy, 211, 118701. [Crossref]
14. Klemeš, J. J., Van Fan, Y., Tan, R. R., & Jiang, P. (2020). Minimising the present and future plastic waste, energy and environmental footprints related to COVID-19. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 127, 109883. [Crossref]
15. Mohanty, M., Mohanty, J., Dey, S., Dutta, K., Shah, M. P., & Das, A. P. (2024). The face mask: A tale from protection to pollution and demanding sustainable solution. Emerging Contaminants, 10(2), 100298. [Crossref]
16. Mokuolu, O. A., & Timothy, R. S. (2021). Circular economy and waste management actions during the covid-19 pandemic in Nigeria. Journal of Human Environment and Health Promotion, 7(1), 1-5. [Crossref]
17. Parashar, N., & Hait, S. (2021). Plastics in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: Protector or polluter? Science of the Total Environment, 759, 144274. [Crossref]
18. Rubio-Romero, J. C., del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira, M., Torrecilla-García, J. A., & Calero-Castro, S. (2020). Disposable masks: Disinfection and sterilization for reuse, and non-certified manufacturing, in the face of shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Safety Science, 129, 104830. [Crossref]
19. Samper, M. D., Bertomeu, D., Arrieta, M. P., Ferri, J. M., & López-Martínez, J. (2018). Interference of biodegradable plastics in the polypropylene recycling process. Materials, 11(10), 1886. [Crossref]
20. Sangkham, S. (2020). Face mask and medical waste disposal during the novel COVID-19 pandemic in Asia. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 2, 100052. [Crossref]
21. Selvaranjan, K., Navaratnam, S., Rajeev, P., & Ravintherakumaran, N. (2021). Environmental challenges induced by extensive use of face masks during COVID-19: A review and potential solutions. Environmental Challenges, 3, 100039. [Crossref]
22. Serafin, J., Sreńscek-Nazzal, J., Kamińska, A., Paszkiewicz, O., & Michalkiewicz, B. (2022). Management of surgical mask waste to activated carbons for CO2 capture. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 59, 101970. [Crossref]
23. Shen, M., Zeng, Z., Song, B., Yi, H., Hu, T., Zhang, Y., . . . & Xiao, R. (2021). Neglected microplastics pollution in global COVID-19: Disposable surgical masks. Science of the Total Environment, 790, 148130. [Crossref]
24. Silva, A. L. P., Prata, J. C., Mouneyrac, C., Barcelò, D., Duarte, A. C., & Rocha-Santos, T. (2021). Risks of Covid-19 face masks to wildlife: Present and future research needs. Science of the Total Environment, 792, 148505. [Crossref]
25. Silva, A. L. P., Prata, J. C., Walker, T. R., Campos, D., Duarte, A. C., Soares, A. M., . . . & Rocha-Santos, T. (2020). Rethinking and optimising plastic waste management under COVID-19 pandemic: Policy solutions based on redesign and reduction of single-use plastics and personal protective equipment. Science of the Total Environment, 742, 140565. [Crossref]
26. Torres-Agullo, A., Karanasiou, A., Moreno, T., & Lacorte, S. (2021). Overview on the occurrence of microplastics in air and implications from the use of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Science of the Total Environment, 800, 149555. [Crossref]
27. Urban, R. C., & Nakada, L. Y. K. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic: Solid waste and environmental impacts in Brazil. Science of the Total Environment, 755, 142471. [Crossref]
28. Vanapalli, K. R., Sharma, H. B., Ranjan, V. P., Samal, B., Bhattacharya, J., Dubey, B. K., & Goel, S. (2021). Challenges and strategies for effective plastic waste management during and post COVID-19 pandemic. Science of the Total Environment, 750, 141514. [Crossref]
29. Wang, L., Li, S., Ahmad, I. M., Zhang, G., Sun, Y., Wang, Y., . . . & Li, D. (2023). Global face mask pollution: Threats to the environment and wildlife, and potential solutions. Science of the Total Environment, 887, 164055. [Crossref]
30. Wang, Z., An, C., Chen, X., Lee, K., Zhang, B., & Feng, Q. (2021). Disposable masks release microplastics to the aqueous environment with exacerbation by natural weathering. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 417, 126036. [Crossref]
31. Xiang, Y., Song, Q., & Gu, W. (2020). Decontamination of surgical face masks and N95 respirators by dry heat pasteurization for one hour at 70 C. American Journal of Infection Control, 48(8), 880-882. [Crossref]
32. Zhang, J., Zhang, L., Yang, H., Kong, Q., Liu, Y., & Yuan, A. (2014). Sustainable processing of waste polypropylene to produce high yield valuable Fe/carbon nanotube nanocomposites. CrystEngComm, 16(37), 8832-8840. [Crossref]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
© 2024 The Author(s)
