Volume 10, Issue 3 (7-2024)                   jhehp 2024, 10(3): 170-176 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mirabbassi B, Zanjani F, Diyanat M. The Study of Environmental Cases in World Trade Organization. jhehp 2024; 10 (3) :170-176
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-596-en.html
1- Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Public International Law, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran.
3- Department of Public International Law, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran; Department of Political Science, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (265 Views)
Background: For the last decades, following an increase in environmental crises, the protection of the environment has been one of the greatest concerns for human beings. Despite the primary objective of the World Trade Organization (WTO) being the promotion of free trade, the severe destruction of the environment due to business activities has forced us to put forward this case in the WTO. As the most significant and influential international organization, the WTO plays a great role in international trade. Sustainable development and protection and preservation of the environment are fundamental goals of the WTO. These objectives, enshrined in the Marrakesh Agreement that established the WTO, complement the WTO’s mission to reduce trade barriers and eliminate discriminatory treatment in international trade relations. While the WTO lacks a specific agreement dealing with environmental issues, its members can adopt trade-related measures aimed at protecting the environment, subject to fulfilling specific conditions to avoid the misuse of such measures for protection purposes. The WTO contributes to the protection and preservation of the environment through its objective of ensuring sustainable development, its rules and mechanism for enforcement, and its work in different WTO bodies.
Methods: The present study employed approach was to use related articles in Google Scholar and Magiran and records and agreements in WTO to examine environmental cases.
Results: The cases analyzed in this study were the following: the gas case with the old and new formula (the US-Gas), the case of the European Union (fireproof cotton), and the case of the turtles and shrimp fishing.
Conclusion: The results showed that although the WTO has achieved some environmental milestones, it has not been sufficiently effective in resolving the environmental challenges caused by energy trade.
Full-Text [PDF 521 kb]   (66 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Public Health
Received: 2024/05/21 | Accepted: 2024/07/3 | Published: 2024/07/14

References
1. Al-Yasin, A. (2014). Under the earth's sky. Samarqand Publishing Institute 2nd Edition. [Google Scholar]
2. Barlow, C. J. (2012). Principles and methods of environmental management. Translated by Mehrdad Android. Congress Publishing Institute, 2nd Edition. [Google Scholar]
3. Baraghi Eskooyi, M. M. (2013). Trade and environment interaction in the world considering the perspective of the world trade organization. Publication of the Institute for Trade Studies and Research, 1st Edition.
4. CAA. Evolution of the clean air act. https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
5. Cho, S. (1998). WTO appellate body report: Gasoline-United States-standards for reformulated and conventional gasoline. European Journal of International Law, 9. [Google Scholar]
6. Dabiri, F., Zare, A., Panahi, M., & Malekpoor, M. (2013). How to solve environmental disputes caused by world trade in the form of WTO dispute resolution legal system, law research. Human and Environment Quarterly, 26, 63-81.
7. Enb, A., Abou Donia, M. A., Abd-Rabou, N. S., Abou-Arab, A. A. K., & El-Senaity, M. H. (2009). Chemical composition of raw milk and heavy metals behavior during processing of milk products. Global Veterinaria, 3(3), 268-275. [Google Scholar]
8. Gerstetter, C. (2014). The WTO judicial decision-makers: How do they deal with multilateral environmental agreements?. Paper for the Amsterdam Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. [Google Scholar]
9. Handl, G. (2012). Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment (Stockholm Declaration), 1972 and the Rio declaration on environment and development, 1992. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, 11(6), 1-11. [Google Scholar]
10. Hartwich, E., & Peet, R. (2013). Neoliberalism and nature: The case of the WTO. The Annals of the American Academy, 202. [Google Scholar]
11. Kamijani, A. (1996). An overview of the formation of the world trade organization and an analysis of the legal and economic aspects resulting from Iran's accession to the world trade organization. Research and Economic Policy, 6, 5-30.
12. Majnounian, H. (2013). Strategies and global treaties for nature and living resources conservation. Environmental Protection Organization, 2nd Edition.
13. Panahi, M. (2012). Biodiversity and traditional knowledge. Ronas Publishing Institute, 1st Edition.
14. Sutherland, P., Bhagwati, J., Botchwey, K., FitzGerald, N., Hamada, K., Jackson, J. H., Lafer, C., & Montbrial, T. (2011). The future of the WTO. WTO Publications Geneva. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/10anniv_e/future_wto_e.pdf
15. Salmanpour Zanooz, A. (2002). International trade and environmental pollution. Political Economic Information, 3-4.
16. Shenk, M. D. (1996). United States-standards for reformulated and conventional gasoline. American Journal of International Law, 669-674. [Google Scholar]
17. Thomas, C. (1992). The United Nations conference on environment and development (UNCED) of 1992, Rio bdeclaration. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
18. WTO. (1996). Venezuela, Brazil versus US: gasoline. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/edis07_e.htm
19. WTO. Agreement establishing the world trade organization. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/04-wto.pdf
20. WTO. European communities-asbestos. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/edis09_e.htm
21. WTO. (1998). India etc versus the US: ‘shrimp-turtle’. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/edis08_e.htm
22. WTO. (2004). Canada-measures relating to exports of wheat and treatment of imported grain. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/276r_e.pdf
23. WTO. (1994). General exceptions: Article XX of the GATT 1994. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/repertory_e/g3_e.htm
24. WTO. (2012). National treatment on internal taxation and regulation. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gatt_ai_e/art3_e.pdf
25. WTO. Preparation, adoption and application of technical regulations by central government bodies. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/ai17_e/tbt_art2_jur.pdf

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 The Author(s)

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Human Environment and Health Promotion

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb