1. World Health Organization. Annual Technical Report: Department of Repro-Ductive Health and Research, Including UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP). 2016. [
Article]
2. Latifnejad-Roudsari R, Zakerihamidi M, Merghati-Khoei E, Kazemnejad A. Cultural Perceptions and Preferences of Iranian Women Regarding Cesarean Delivery. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014; 19(7 Suppl 1): S28-36. [
Google Scholar]
3. Rafiei M, Ghare MS, Akbari M, Kiani F, Sayehmiri F, Sayehmiri K, et al. Prevalence, Causes, and Complications of Cesarean Delivery in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018; 16(4): 221-34. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
4. Deys L, Wilson V, Meedya S. What are Women’s Experiences of Immediate Skin-to-Skin Contact at Caesarean Section Birth? An Integrative Literature Review. Midwifery. 2021; 101. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
5. Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-Term Risks and Benefits Associated with Cesarean Delivery for Mother, Baby, and Subsequent Pregnancies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS Med. 2018; 15(1): e1002494. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
6. Thanh BY, Lumbiganon P, Pattanittum P, Laopaiboon M, Vogel JP, Oladapo OT, et al. Mode of Delivery and Pregnancy Outcomes in Preterm Birth: A Secondary Analysis of the WHO Global and Multi-Country Surveys. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 15556. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
7. Li HT, Zhou YB, Liu JM. The Impact of Cesarean Section on Offspring Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Obes. 2013; 37(7): 893-9. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
8. Prado DS, Mendes RB, Gurgel RQ, Barreto IDC, Cipolotti R, Gurgel RQ. The Influence of Mode of Delivery on Neonatal and Maternal Short and Long-Term Outcomes. Rev Saude Publica. 2018; 52: 95. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
9. Bodner K, Wierrani F, Grünberger W, Bodner-Adler B. Influence of the Mode of Delivery on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Comparison Between Elective Cesarean Section and Planned Vaginal Delivery in a Low-Risk Obstetric Population. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 283(6): 1193-8. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
10. Higgins M, Farine D. Assessment of Labor Progress. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 8(1): 83-95. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
11. Financial Tribune. LDR Rooms Encourage Natural Childbirth. 2017. [
Article]
12. Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M. Prevalence and Causes of Cesarean Section in Iran: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran J Public Health. 2014; 43(5): 545. [
Google Scholar]
13. Whitburn LY, Jones LE, Davey MA, Small R. The Meaning of Labour Pain: How the Social Environment and Other Contextual Factors Shape Women’s Experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17(1): 1. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
14. Stark MA, Remynse M, Zwelling E. Importance of the Birth Environment to Support Physiologic Birth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016; 45(2): 285-94. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
15. Gedey S. Labor-Delivery-Recovery Room Design that Facilitates Non-Pharmacological Reduction of Labor Pain: A Model LDR Room Plan and Recommended Best Practices. Perkins Will Res J. 2014; 6: 127-39. [
Article]
16. Ariadne Labs & Mass Design Group. Designing Capacity for High Value Healthcare: The Impact of Design on Clinical Care in Childbirth. [
Article]
17. Newburn M, Singh D. Creating a Better Birth Environment: Women's Views about the Design and Facilities in Maternity Units: A National Survey. Natl Childbirth Trust. 2003. [
Google Scholar]
18. Mirghafourvand M, Meedya S, Mohammadi E, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Jafarabadi MA, Ghanbari-Homaie S. Iranian Women’s Perception on the Determinants of Birth Experience: A Qualitative Study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1): 751. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]
19. World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience. 2018. [
Article]
20. Gheitarani N, El-Sayed S, Cloutier S, Budruk M, Gibbons L, Khanian M. Investigating Mechanism of Place and Community Impact on Quality of Life of Rural-Urban Migrants. Int J Community Wellbeing. 2020; 3: 21-38. [
Crossref] [
Google Scholar]