Mon, May 26, 2025
[Archive]
.png)
Volume 2, Issue 1 (12-2016)
jhehp 2016, 2(1): 1-8 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Talaiekhozani A, Eskandari Z, Bagheri M, Talaie M R. Removal of H2S and COD Using UV, Ferrate and UV/Ferrate from Municipal Wastewater. jhehp 2016; 2 (1) :1-8
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-79-en.html
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-79-en.html
1- Department of Civil Engineering, Jami Institute of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Department of Chemical Engineering, Jami Institute of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
3- Department of Chemical Engineering,, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Department of Chemical Engineering, Jami Institute of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
3- Department of Chemical Engineering,, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract: (11421 Views)
Background; The aim of this study is to compare UV, ferrate (VI) and UV/ferrate (VI) methods for removal of hydrogen sulfide and chemical oxygen demand (COD) from municipal wastewater under a continuous condition.
Methods; The experiment was divided into three parts: 1) pollutants removal by using ferrate (VI) alone; 2) pollutants removal using UV alone; 3) pollutants removal using a combination of UV/ferrate (VI). The electrolysis process was utilized to generate ferrate (VI).
Results;The results showed that UV had the highest pollutants removal, so that 89% and 85% of hydrogen sulfide and COD were removed from the wastewater, respectively. UV/ferrate (VI) ranked as the next most efficient method. This method removed 65% and 73% of hydrogen sulfide and COD, respectively from the wastewater.
Conclusion; Using ferrate (VI) alone had the lowest pollutant removal efficiency, with 41% and 48% of hydrogen sulfide and COD removal from wastewater, respectively. UV has a higher ability to remove hydrogen sulfide and COD from wastewater, compared with UV/ferrate (VI) and ferrate (VI) alone.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Environmental Health, Sciences, and Engineering
Received: 2016/10/8 | Accepted: 2016/11/21 | Published: 2016/12/24
Received: 2016/10/8 | Accepted: 2016/11/21 | Published: 2016/12/24
References
1. Bandala ER, Miranda J, Beltran M, Vaca M, López R, Torres LG. Wastewater Disinfection and Organic Matter Removal Using Ferrate (VI) Oxidation. J Water Health. 2009; 7(3): 507-13. [Crossref]
2. Sharma VK, Kazama F, Jiangyong H, Ray AK. Ferrates (Iron (VI) and Iron (V)): Environmentally Friendly Oxidants and Disinfectants. J Water Health. 2005; 3(1): 45-58. [Crossref]
3. Talaiekhozani A, Bagheri M, Goli A, Khoozani MRT. An Overview of Principles of Odor Production, Emission, and Control Methods in Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems. J Environ Manag. 2016; 170: 86-206. [Crossref]
4. Nielsen PH, Raunkjær K, Hvitved-Jacobsen T. Sulfide Production and Wastewater Quality in Pressure Mains. Water Sci Technol. 1998; 37(1): 97-104. [Crossref]
5. Rice EW, Baird RB, Eaton AD, Clesceri L. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Am Public Health Assoc, Washington, DC. 2012.
6. Chen Y, Xiong Y, Wang Z, Chen Y, Chen G, Liu Z. UV/ferrate (VI) Oxidation of Profenofos: Efficiency and Mechanism. Desalination Water Treat. 2015; 55(2): 506-13. [Crossref]
7. Sharma VK, Smith JO, Millero FJ. Ferrate (VI) Oxidation of Hydrogen Sulfide. Environ Sci Technol. 1997; 31(9): 2486-91. [Crossref]
8. Zhiyong L, Megan S, Jia-Qian J, Virender KS. Methodologies for the Analytical Determination of Ferrat (VI): A Review. J Environ Sci Health. 2011: 453-60.
9. Wang H, Liu Y, Zeng F, Song S. Electrochemical Synthesis of Ferrate (VI) by Regular Anodic Replacement. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2015; 10(10): 7966-76.
10. Federation WE, Association APH. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Am Public Health Assoc (APHA): USA, Washington, DC. 2005.
11. Eskandari Z. Control of Hydrogen Sulfide and Organic Compounds in Municipal Wastewater by Using Ferrate (VI) Produced by Electrochemical Method. Isfahan, Iran: Jami Institute of Technol; 2016.
12. Zhao F, Zhou J-D, Ma F, Shi R-J, Han S-Q, Zhang J, et al. Simultaneous Inhibition of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria, Removal of H2S and Production of Rhamnolipid by Recombinant Pseudomonas Stutzeri Rhl: Applications for Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 207: 24-30. [Crossref]
13. Talaiekhozani A, Bagheri M, Talaei MR, Jaafarzadeh N. An Overview on Production and Applications of Ferrate (VI). Jundishapur J Health Sci. 2016 [In Press]. [Crossref]
14. Talaiekhozani A, Salari M, Talaei MR, Bagheri M, Eskandari Z. Formaldehyde Removal from Wastewater and Air by Using UV, Ferrate (VI) and UV/Ferrate (VI). J Environ Manag. 2016; 184: 204-9. [Crossref]
15. Kaempfer W, Berndt M, editors. Polymer Modified Mortar with High Resistance to Acid to Corrosion by Biogenic Sulfuric Acid. 14th Proceedings of the Ixth Icpic Congress, Bologna, Italy; 1998.
16. Manoli K, Nakhla G, Ray AK, Sharma VK. Enhanced Oxidative Transformation of Organic Contaminants by Activation of Ferrate (VI): Possible Involvement of Fe V/Fe IV Species. Chem Eng J. 2016.
17. Feng M, Wang X, Chen J, Qu R, Sui Y, Cizmas L, et al. Degradation of Fluor Quinolone Antibiotics by Ferrate (VI): Effects of Water Constituents and Oxidized Products. Water Res. 2016; 103: 48-57. [Crossref]
18. Fulazzaky MA, Talaiekhozani A, Majid MZA, Ponraj M, Goli A. Evaluation of Gas Retention Time Effects on the Bio-Trickling Filter Reactor Performance for Treating Air Contaminated with Formaldehyde. RSC Adv. 2013; 3(38): 17462-8. [Crossref]
19. Fulazzaky MA, Talaiekhozani A, Hadibarata T. Calculation of Optimal Gas Retention Time Using a Logarithmic Equation Applied to a Bio-Trickling Filter Reactor for Formaldehyde Removal from Synthetic Contaminated Air. RSC Adv. 2013; 3(15): 5100-7. [Crossref]
20. Zupanc M, Kosjek T, Petkovšek M, Dular M, Kompare B, Širok B, et al. Removal of Pharmaceuticals from Wastewater by Biological Processes, Hydrodynamic Cavitation and UV Treatment. Ultrason Sonochem. 2013; 20(4): 1104-12. [Crossref]
21. Kowalik P. Chemical Pretreatment of Formaldehyde Wastewater by Selected Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs). Chall Mod Technol. 2011; 2(4).
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
© 2024 The Author(s)
