Thu, Nov 21, 2024
[Archive]
.png)
1- School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Australia; Haian Second Experimental Kindergarten, Haian City, Jiangsu Province, China.
2- Haian Second Experimental Kindergarten, Haian City, Jiangsu Province, China.
2- Haian Second Experimental Kindergarten, Haian City, Jiangsu Province, China.
Abstract: (106 Views)
Background: This study aimed to explore the mechanisms of prioritizing risk factors of coffee consumption in kindergarten children based on parental perceived changeability and importance. It was conducted in a local Chinese kindergarten, with study participants involving 40 parents.
Methods: Qualitative data were generated by conducting semi-structured interviews and analyzed employing a thematic inductive analysis approach.
Results: Multiple risk factors related to high doses of coffee consumption in children were identified. Notably, children’s mobile phone use and sleep behavior were considered relatively more changeable and more important risk factors, which should be addressed in intervention development. Moreover, other identified risk factors, including later diner times, physical activity participation, parental coffee consumption before sleep, and parental perceived benefits and barriers of coffee consumption, require further contextual investigation.
Conclusion: Future intervention development should target parental influences on children’s coffee consumption and sleep health. The aim should be to promote awareness of sleep hygiene behaviors in both children and parents as a starting point. The intervention development process could be an iterative and back casting approach, necessitating extensive information gathering and in-depth consideration of critically revisiting the existing data to enhance the potential success and effectiveness of the intervention.
Methods: Qualitative data were generated by conducting semi-structured interviews and analyzed employing a thematic inductive analysis approach.
Results: Multiple risk factors related to high doses of coffee consumption in children were identified. Notably, children’s mobile phone use and sleep behavior were considered relatively more changeable and more important risk factors, which should be addressed in intervention development. Moreover, other identified risk factors, including later diner times, physical activity participation, parental coffee consumption before sleep, and parental perceived benefits and barriers of coffee consumption, require further contextual investigation.
Conclusion: Future intervention development should target parental influences on children’s coffee consumption and sleep health. The aim should be to promote awareness of sleep hygiene behaviors in both children and parents as a starting point. The intervention development process could be an iterative and back casting approach, necessitating extensive information gathering and in-depth consideration of critically revisiting the existing data to enhance the potential success and effectiveness of the intervention.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Health Promotion
Received: 2024/05/22 | Accepted: 2024/09/26
Received: 2024/05/22 | Accepted: 2024/09/26
References
1. Bektas, G., Boelsma, F., Wesdorp, C. L., Seidell, J. C., Baur, V. E., & Dijkstra, S. C. (2021). Supporting parents and healthy behaviours through parent-child meetings-a qualitative study in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1169. [Crossref]
2. Bendotti, H., Ireland, D., Lawler, S., Oates, D., Gartner, C., & Marshall, H. M. (2023). Introducing quin: the design and development of a prototype chatbot to support smoking cessation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 26(5), 612-620. [Crossref]
3. Bibri, S. E. (2018). Backcasting in future studies: a synthesized scholarly and planning approach to strategic smart sustainable city development. European Journal of Futures Research, 6(1), 13. [Crossref]
4. Bradshaw, M., Kent, B. V., Davidson, J. C., & De Leon, S. (2021). Parents, peers, and trajectories of cigarette smoking: a group-based approach. Youth & Society, 53(4), 676-694. [Crossref]
5. Bramstedt, K. A. (2007). Caffeine use by children: the quest for enhancement. Substance Use & Misuse, 42(8), 1237-1251. [Crossref]
6. de Buhr, E., & Tannen, A. (2020). Parental health literacy and health knowledge, behaviours and outcomes in children: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1096. [Crossref]
7. Duan, D., Gu, C., Polotsky, V. Y., Jun, J. C., & Pham, L. V. (2021). Effects of dinner timing on sleep stage distribution and EEG power spectrum in healthy volunteers. Nature and Science of Sleep, 13, 601-612. [Crossref]
8. Green, L. W., Kreuter, M. W., & Green, L. W. (2005). Health program planning: An educational and ecological approach. Mountain View.
9. Harvey, J., & Chadi, N. (2016). Strategies to promote smoking cessation among adolescents. Paediatrics & Child Health, 21(4), 201-208. [Crossref]
10. Hashemzadeh, M., Rahimi, A., Zare-Farashbandi, F., Alavi-Naeini, A. M., & Daei, A. (2019). Transtheoretical model of health behavioral change: a systematic review. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 24(2), 83-90. [Crossref]
11. Hickman, A. C., Johnson, R. L., & Lawler, S. P. (2022). Health-promoting pedagogy: using reflexivity to support learning and action in planetary health education. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 33(S1), 22-26. [Crossref]
12. Johnson, H., Yorganci, E., Evans, C. J., Barclay, S., Murtagh, F. E., Yi, D., . . . & Koffman, J. (2020). Implementation of a complex intervention to improve care for patients whose situations are clinically uncertain in hospital settings: A multi-method study using normalisation process theory. PloS One, 15(9), e0239181. [Crossref]
13. Jones, C. J., Smith, H., & Llewellyn, C. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of health belief model interventions in improving adherence: a systematic review. Health Psychology Review, 8(3), 253-269. [Crossref]
14. Kinsey, A. W., & Ormsbee, M. J. (2015). The health impact of nighttime eating: old and new perspectives. Nutrients, 7(4), 2648-2662. [Crossref]
15. Kumar, S., & Preetha, G. (2012). Health promotion: an effective tool for global health. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 37(1), 5-12. [Crossref]
16. Lu, Y. (2023). A process evaluation of a health promotion intervention to increase breakfast consumption in children. Nutrition and Health, 02601060231187274. [Crossref]
17. Porter, C. M. (2015). Revisiting precede-proceed: a leading model for ecological and ethical health promotion. Health Education Journal, 75(6), 753-764. [Crossref]
18. Pyper, E., Harrington, D., & Manson, H. (2016). The impact of different types of parental support behaviours on child physical activity, healthy eating, and screen time: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 568. [Crossref]
19. Ricotti, R., Caputo, M., Monzani, A., Pigni, S., Antoniotti, V., Bellone, S., & Prodam, F. (2021). Breakfast skipping, weight, cardiometabolic risk, and nutrition quality in children and adolescents: a systematic review of randomized controlled and intervention longitudinal trials. Nutrients, 13(10), 3331. [Crossref]
20. Seifert, S. M., Schaechter, J. L., Hershorin, E. R., & Lipshultz, S. E. (2011). Health effects of energy drinks on children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatrics, 127(3), 511-528. [Crossref]
21. Shrestha, B., & Jawa, G. (2017). Caffeine citrate-is it a silver bullet in neonatology? Pediatrics & Neonatology, 58(5), 391-397. [Crossref]
22. Stokols, D. (1996). Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10(4), 282-298. [Crossref]
23. Temple, J. L. (2019). Trends, safety, and recommendations for caffeine use in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 58(1), 36-45. [Crossref]
24. Torres-Ugalde, Y. C., Romero-Palencia, A., Román-Gutiérrez, A. D., Ojeda-Ramírez, D., & Guzmán-Saldaña, R. M. E. (2020). Caffeine consumption in children: innocuous or deleterious? a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2489. [Crossref]
25. Tougas, M. E., Hayden, J. A., McGrath, P. J., Huguet, A., & Rozario, S. (2015). A systematic review exploring the social cognitive theory of self-regulation as a framework for chronic health condition interventions. PloS One, 10(8), e0134977. [Crossref]
26. Wigginton, B., Fjeldsoe, B., Mutch, A., & Lawler, S. (2018). Creating reflexive health promotion practitioners: our process of integrating reflexivity in the development of a health promotion course. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 5(1), 75-78. [Crossref]
27. Wigginton, B., Thomson, Z. O., Sandler, C. X., & Reeves, M. M. (2020). Reflexive intervention development: using qualitative research to inform the development of an intervention for women with metastatic breast cancer. Qualitative Health Research, 30(5), 666-678. [Crossref]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
© 2024 The Author(s)
