Thu, Nov 21, 2024
[Archive]
.png)
Volume 8, Issue 1 (3-2022)
jhehp 2022, 8(1): 22-26 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zarei M, Fadaei V, Mirzaei M. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of the Alcoholic Extract of Quercus brantii subsp. persica. jhehp 2022; 8 (1) :22-26
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-463-en.html
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-463-en.html
1- Department of Food Science and Technology, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (4476 Views)
Background: Lately, consumption of natural preservatives to improve food products' shelf life has been the center of attention. Due to the approved health benefits of the oak fruit, its application in food industry as a preservative seems satisfying.
Methods: Antimicrobial activity of the alcoholic extract of the oak fruit in concentrations of 200, 400, 600 and 800 mg/mL was investigated on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae with well diffusion technique. In order to detect the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bacterial concentration (MBC), macro-dilution broth and subculturing on solid culture media techniques were used.
Results: The most growth prevention and inhibitory effect was observed in S. aureus, S. cerevisiae, K. pneumoniae, S. typhi, and E. coli, respectively. The most and the least antimicrobial activity of the oak fruit extract were observed in S. aureus (MIC=0.15 mg/mL and MBC = 0.313 mg/mL) and E. coli (MIC = 2.5 mg/mL and MBC=5 mg/mL), respectively.
Conclusion: The alcoholic extract of Iranian oak fruit had antimicrobial activity, and its impact was more profound on gram-positive bacteria such as S. aureus and S. cerevisiae than gram- negative ones namely E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and S. typhi.
Methods: Antimicrobial activity of the alcoholic extract of the oak fruit in concentrations of 200, 400, 600 and 800 mg/mL was investigated on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae with well diffusion technique. In order to detect the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bacterial concentration (MBC), macro-dilution broth and subculturing on solid culture media techniques were used.
Results: The most growth prevention and inhibitory effect was observed in S. aureus, S. cerevisiae, K. pneumoniae, S. typhi, and E. coli, respectively. The most and the least antimicrobial activity of the oak fruit extract were observed in S. aureus (MIC=0.15 mg/mL and MBC = 0.313 mg/mL) and E. coli (MIC = 2.5 mg/mL and MBC=5 mg/mL), respectively.
Conclusion: The alcoholic extract of Iranian oak fruit had antimicrobial activity, and its impact was more profound on gram-positive bacteria such as S. aureus and S. cerevisiae than gram- negative ones namely E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and S. typhi.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Food Safety and Hygiene
Received: 2021/11/24 | Accepted: 2022/01/29 | Published: 2022/03/16
Received: 2021/11/24 | Accepted: 2022/01/29 | Published: 2022/03/16
References
1. Cawan MM. Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents. Clin Microbial Rev. 2003; 12 (4): 564 –82. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. Ghaderi Q, Sadiqi M, Alaami V, Azizi MH. The Effect of Acidic, Alkaline and Saline Conditions on the Removal of Phenolic Compounds from the Fruits of Two Oak Varieties. Iranian Food Sci Technol Res J. 2011; 7(1): 50-9. [In Persian] [Article]
3. Karimian M, Najafi R, Jaimand K, Hatami F, Abbasi N, Jalali Ghalousangh A. Extraction and Identification of Phytochemicals in Iranian Oak (Quercusbrantii var. Persica) Collected in Arghavan Valley, Ilam County by HS-SPME and GC-MS. J Medicinal Plants By-Products (JMPB). 2020; 1: 81-8. [Google Scholar]
4. Ebrahimi A, Khayami M, Nejati M. Comparison of aAntimicrobial eEffect of dDifferent pParts of Quercus persica Against Escherichia coli 0157:H7. Ofogh-e-Danesh. GMUHS J. 2012; 18 (1): 23-32. [In Persian] [Article] [Crossref]
5. Karimi M, Saedi S and Rafiyan, N. The Inhibitory Effect of Oak Fruit Extract on the Proliferation of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1. Armaghan Danesh Magazine. 2010; 16: 163-41. [In Persian] [Article]
6. Harborne JB, Baxter H. Chemical Dictionary of Economic Plants. John Wiley and Sons, LTD. 2013; 10 (1): 109-228. [Article]
7. Zargari A. Pharmaceutical Plants. 2nd ed. Tehran: Amir Kabir Pub; 2000. [In Persian].
8. Sadeghian I, Hassanshahian M, Sadeghian S, Jamali SH. Antimicrobial Effects of Quercus brantii Fruits on Bacterial Pathogens. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2012; 5(3): 465-9. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
9. Taran M, Azizi M, Sharifi M. Antibacterial and Antifungal Effects of Hydroalcoholic and Etheric Extracts of Iranian Oak. Microbial Biotechnol. 2010; 2 (4): 12-7. [In Persian] [Article]
10. Behzadi A, Khosravi A. An AntiBacterial Effect of Methanolic Extract of Oak and Pistachio Extract Using an Introvert Method and Comparison with Common Antibiotics in the tTreatment of Gastrointestinal Bacteria. Ph.D. thesis. Ahwaz Univ Med Sci, Ahvaz: Faculty Pharm. 2001. [In Persian]. [Article]
11. Khosravi AD, Behzadi A. Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of the Seed Hull of Quercus branti on Some Gram-Negative Bacteria. Pak J Med Sci. 2006; 22(4): 429-32. [Google Scholar]
12. Basri DF, Fan SH. The Potential of Aqueous and Acetone Extracts of Galls of Quercus infectoria as Antibacterial Agents. Indian J Pharmacol. 2005; 37 (1): 26 – 9. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
13. Hayouni EA, Abedrabba M, Bouix M and Hamdi M. The Effects of Solvents and Extraction Method on the Phenolic Contents and Biological Activities in Vitro of Tunisian Quercus coccifera L. and Juniperus phoenicea L. fruit extracts. Food Chem. 2007; 105 (3): 1126 - 34. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
14. Safary, A, Motamedi, H, Maleki S, and S. Seyyednejad. M. A Preliminary Study on the Antibacterial Activity of Quercus brantii Against Bacterial Pathogens, Particularly Enteric Pathogens. Int J Botany. 2009; 5 (2): 176-80. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
15. Sharifi A, Georgian P, Coldness M, Mohammadi R, Jabarnejad A. Antifungal Effect of Quercus infectoria Gall (Oak) on Saprolegnia Fungi. Armaghane Danesh. 2012; 17 (1): 83-79. [Google Scholar]
16. Sefidgar SAA, Taghizadeh Armaki M, Pournajaf A, Ardebili A, Omidi S, Abdian Asl A. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Alcoholic and Aqueous Extracts from Common Hop (Humulus lupulus) and oak (Quercus Castaneifolia). J Arak Uni Med Sci. 2015; 17 (12): 39-46 [Google Scholar]
17. Borjian Borujeni S, Kaveh Baba Heidari E, Mortezaei S, Borjian Borujeni M, Validi M. Study Antibacterial Effects of Hydroalcoholic Extract of Acorn Fruit´s (Quercus branti) Against Listeria Monocytogenes and Enterococcus Faecalis in Vitro. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2016; 17: 98-106. [Google Scholar]
18. Omidi A, Sharifi A. The Effect of Methanolic Extracts of Plants Quercus Brantii, Pistacia Atlantica and Elaeagnus Angustifolia on Biofilm Formation of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Armaghane-Danesh. 2017; 21 (10): 999-1012. [In Persian] [Article]
19. Shahi F, Hashemi A, Abdolmaleki Kh, Shahi Z, Amraei Sh, Goudarzi H, et al. Antibacterial Effects of Quercus Brantii Fruits and Stachys Lavandulifolia Methanol Extracts on Imipenemase-Type Metallo-Beta Lactamase-Producing Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Res J Pharm. 2017; 4(3): 59-66. [Google Scholar]
20. Bahar Z, Ghotaslou R, Taheri Sh. In Vitro Anti-Biofilm Activity of Quercus Brantii Subsp. Persica on Human Pathogenic Bacteria. Res J Pharm. 2017; 4 (1): 67-73. [Google Scholar]
21. Fatehi S, Mohammadi Sichani M, Tavakoli M. Evaluation of Antimicrobial and Anti-Quorum Sensing Activity of Mazouj and Ghalghaf Galls Extracts of Oak Against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2018; 12 (10): 36-45. [In Persian]. [Article] [Crossref]
22. Seifi T, Saeb L, Rezaei Zanghane A, Azh M. 2018. Evaluating AntiBacterial Activity of Quercus Brant Fruit Hydroalcoholic Extract with Diffusion in Wells. In processing: 12th Iranian Veterinary Students Congress. Semnan, Iran. 2018.
23. Aleebrahim Dehkordy E , Rafieian Kopaei M, Amini Khoei H, Abbasi S. In Vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity and Antibacterial Effects and Measurement of Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents of Quercus brantii L. Fruit Extract. J Dietary Suppl. 2019; 16 (4): 408-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
24. Ghaderi M, Sadeghi Mahoonak A, Alami M, Khomeiri M, Mamashloo S. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of the Ethanolic Extracts from Q. Branti and Q. Castaneifolia Fruit Against some Foodborne Pathogens by Microdilution Method. Food Technol Nutr. 2012; 9: 1. [Google Scholar]
25. Mortazavi Z. Investigating the Effect of Different Times on Bacterial Flora of Pasteurized Cheese Tabriz. Master's Degree in Nutrition Sci, Faculty of Health and Nutr, Tabriz Univ Med Sci. 2014. [In Persian].
26. Hyldgaard M, Mygind T, Meyer RL. Essential Oils in Food Preservation: Mode of Action, Synergies, and Interactions with Food Matrix Components. Front Microbiol. 2012; 3: 1-24. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
27. Shariatifar N, Fathabad AE, Khaniki GJ, Nasrabadi HG. Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oil and Aqueous and Ethanolic Extracts of Quercus Infectoria Leaves on Food-Borne Pathogenic Bacteria. Int J Pharma Sci and Res. 2014; 5(10): 709- 713. [In persian]
28. Nair R, Kalariya T, Chanada S. Antibacterial Activity of Some Plant Extracts Used in Folk Medicine. J Herb Pharmacother. 2007; 7: 191-201. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
29. Dorman HJD, Deans SG. Antimicrobial Agents from Plants: Antibacterial Activity of Plant Volatile Oils. J Appl Microbiol. 2000; 88(2): 308-16. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
30. Pandit VA, Shelef LA. Sensitivity of Listeria Monocytogenes to Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.). Food Microbiol. 1994; 11 (1): 57-63. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
31. Oussalah M, Caillet S, Saucier L, Lacroix M. Inhibitory Effects of Selected Plant Essential Oils on the Growth of Four Pathogenic Bacteria: E. coli O157: H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, Staphylococcus Aureus and Listeria Monocytogenes. Food Control. 2007; 18 (5): 414-20. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
© 2024 The Author(s)
