Mon, May 26, 2025
[Archive]
.png)
Volume 7, Issue 2 (6-2021)
jhehp 2021, 7(2): 83-89 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rodat S. Seeking Online Health-Related Information by German Seniors: A Qualitative Study. jhehp 2021; 7 (2) :83-89
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-403-en.html
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-403-en.html
Adventus University, Faculty of Theology and Social Sciences, Cernica, Ilfov, Romania.
Abstract: (9777 Views)
Background: The internet has become one of the most common informative media for health-related issues. Regarding older people, more research is needed to collect in-depth data on Internet use for health information. The present study aimed to provide an overview on health-related internet use by seniors in Germany.
Methods: This descriptive-analytical qualitative study was conducted on 10 German seniors aged 65-83 years. In order to obtain the required information, in-depth semi-structured interview was carried out between March-June 2017. The target population were recruited using snowball sampling strategy. The transcribed interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
Results: The findings of the study revealed that seniors’ activity on the Internet include a variety of medical interests. Most of the interviewees access specific medical websites directly, without using search engines. Although about half of the respondents seemed to become online health information overload, most of them made claims about the ability to evaluate its reliability.
Conclusions: For most of the interviewees the health-related information on the Internet provides a basis of knowledge. Despite the fact that the seniors consider online information useful to make health-related decisions, most of them prefer to consult at least one doctor, still adhering to the physician-centred care model.
Methods: This descriptive-analytical qualitative study was conducted on 10 German seniors aged 65-83 years. In order to obtain the required information, in-depth semi-structured interview was carried out between March-June 2017. The target population were recruited using snowball sampling strategy. The transcribed interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
Results: The findings of the study revealed that seniors’ activity on the Internet include a variety of medical interests. Most of the interviewees access specific medical websites directly, without using search engines. Although about half of the respondents seemed to become online health information overload, most of them made claims about the ability to evaluate its reliability.
Conclusions: For most of the interviewees the health-related information on the Internet provides a basis of knowledge. Despite the fact that the seniors consider online information useful to make health-related decisions, most of them prefer to consult at least one doctor, still adhering to the physician-centred care model.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Health Promotion
Received: 2021/02/16 | Accepted: 2021/04/17 | Published: 2021/06/30
Received: 2021/02/16 | Accepted: 2021/04/17 | Published: 2021/06/30
References
1. Powell J, Clarke A. The WWW of the World Wide Web: Who, What, and Why? J Med Internet Res. 2002; 4(1): e4. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. McMillan SJ, Macias W. Strengthening the Safety Net for Online Seniors: Factors Influencing Differences in Health Information Seeking among Older Internet Users. J Health Commun. 2008; 13(8): 778-92. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
3. Xie B, Wang M, Feldman R, Zhou L. Exploring Older and Younger Adults’ Preferences for Health Information and Participation in Decision Making Using the Health Information Wants Questionnaire (HIWQ). Health Expect. 2014; 17(6): 795-808. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
4. Van Deursen AJ, Helsper EJ. A Nuanced Understanding of Internet use and Non-Use amongst Older Adults. Eur J Commun. 2015; 30(2): 171-87. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
5. Smith A. Older Adults and Technology Use: Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. [Internet & American Life Project] [online] 2014; Available from: URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-techno logy-use/.
6. Marinescu V, Rodat S. Romanian and German Seniors in Quest of Online Health-Related Information: An Exploratory Comparative Study. Romanian J Commun Public Relat. 2018; 20(1): 25-45. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
7. European Commission. The 2015 Ageing Report: Economic and Budgetary Projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013-2060) [online] 2015; Available from: URL: https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2015/pdf/ee3_en.pdf.
8. Campbell RJ, Nolfi DA. Teaching Elderly Adults to Use the Internet to Access Health Care Information: Before-After Study. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 7(2): e19. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
9. Campbell RJ. Internet-Based Health Information Seeking among Low-Income, Minority Seniors Living in Urban Residential Centers. Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2009; 21(3): 195-202. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
10. McMellon CA, Schiffman LG. Cybersenior Empowerment: How Some Older Individuals are Taking Control of Their Lives. J Appl Gerontol. 2002; 21(2): 157-75. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. Shapira N, Barak A, Gal I. Promoting Older Adults’ Well-Being Through Internet training and Use. Aging Ment Health. 2007; 11(5): 477-84. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
12. Gatto SL, Tak SH. Computer, Internet, and E-Mail Use among Older Adults: Benefits and Barriers. Educ Gerontol. 2008; 34(9): 800-11. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
13. Mellor D, Firth L, Moore K. Can the Internet Improve the Well-Being of the Elderly? Ageing Int. 2008; 32(1): 25-42. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
14. Karavidas M, Lim NK, Katsikas SL. The Effects of Computers on Older Adult Users. Comput Human Behav. 2005; 21(5): 697-711. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
15. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241. New York: United Nations. [online] 2015; Available from: URL: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/ files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf.
16. Statistisches Bundesamt. Bevölkerung in Deutschland and 13. Koordinierte Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung FüR Deutschland [online] 2018; Available from: URL: https://service.destatis.de/bevoelkerungspyramide/.
17. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects 2019. Volume I: Comprehensive Tables. New York: United Nations. [online] 2019; Available from: URL: https://population.un.org/wpp/default.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Volume-I_Comprehensive-Tables.pdf.
18. Eurostat. A Look at the Lives of the Elderly in the EU Today [online] 2017; Available from: URL: http://ec.eur opa.eu/eurostat/cache/infographs/elderly/index.html.
19. Frees B, Koch W. Internetnutzung: Frequenz und Vielfalt Nehmen in Allen Altersgruppen zu. Media Perspektiven. 2015; 9/2015: 366-77.
20. Carrin G, James C. Social Health Insurance: Key Factors Affecting the Transition Towards Universal Coverage. Int Soc Secur Rev. 2005; 58(1): 45-64. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
21. Health Consumer Powerhouse. Euro Health Consumer Index 2015 Report. Health Consumer Powerhouse Ltd. [online] 2016; Available from: URL: https://healthpowerhouse.com/files/EHCI_2015/EHCI_ 2015_report.pdf.
22. The Commonwealth Fund. International Profiles of Health Care Systems, 2013. Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and theUnited States [online] 2013; Available from: URL: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Fund%20Report/2013/Nov/1717_Thomson_intl_profiles_hlt_care_sys_2013_v2.pdf.
23. Van Deursen AJAM, Van Dijk J. The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usage. New Med Soc. 2014; 16(3): 507-26. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
24. Lambert SD, Loiselle CG. Health Information-Seeking Behavior. Qual Health Res. 2007; 17(8): 1006-19. [Crossref]
25. Eriksson Backa K, Ek S, Niemelä R, Huotari ML. Health Information Literacy in Everyday Life: a Study of Finns Aged 65–79 Years. Health Inform J. 2012; 18(2): 83-94. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
26. Levy H, Janke AT, Langa KM. Health Literacy and the Digital Divide among Older Americans. J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30(3): 284-9. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
27. Chung J, Gassert CA, Kim HS. Online Health Information Use by Participants in Selected Senior Centres in Korea: Current Status of Internet Access and Health Information Use by Korean Older Adults. Int J Older People Nurs. 2011; 6(4): 261-71. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
28. Chaudhuri MS, Le MT, White MC, Thompson H, Demiris G. Examining Health Information-Seeking Behaviors of Older Adults. Comput Inform Nurs. 2013; 31(11): 547-53. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
29. Tian Y, Robinson JD. Incidental Health Information Use and Media Complementarity: A Comparison of Senior and Non-Senior Cancer Patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 71(3): 340-4. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
30. Robertson-Lang L, Major S, Hemming H. An Exploration of Search Patterns and Credibility Issues among Older Adults Seeking Online Health Information. Can J Aging. 2011; 30(4): 631-45. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
31. Wicks DA. Older Adults and Their Information Seeking. Behav Soc Sci Librar. 2004; 22(2): 1-26. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
32. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. [online] 2013; Available from: URL: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx.
33. Breemhaar B, Visser AP, Kleijnen JGVM. Perceptions and Behaviour among Elderly Hospital Patients: Description and Explanation of Age Differences in Satisfaction, Knowledge, Emotions and Behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 1990; 31(12): 1377-85. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
34. Caress AL. Patient roles in Decision-Making. Nurs Times. 1997; 93(31): 45-8. [Google Scholar]
35. Moscovici S, Buschini F, Dir. Les Méthodes Des Sciences Humaines. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, Collection: Fondamental; 2003.
36. Gunter B. Media Research Methods: Measuring Audiences. Reactions and Impact. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications; 2000. [Google Scholar]
37. Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990. [Google Scholar]
38. Atkinson R, Flint J. Accessing Hidden and Hard-To-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies. Soc Res Update. 2001; 33(1): 1-4. [Google Scholar]
39. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Research: Concepts, Procedures and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004; 24(2): 105-12. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
40. Miles MB, Huberman MA, Saldaña J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage Publications; 2014. [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
© 2024 The Author(s)
