Thu, Nov 21, 2024
[Archive]
.png)
Volume 6, Issue 4 (12-2020)
jhehp 2020, 6(4): 153-158 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Miryousefiaval Z, Zamani A, Khosravi Y. Comparison of the Interpolation of Lead and Zinc Accumulation in the Soils around Zanjan Lead and Zinc Corporation Using laboratory and Landsat Data. jhehp 2020; 6 (4) :153-158
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-375-en.html
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-375-en.html
1- Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Zanjan, Iran.
Abstract: (7852 Views)
Background: This aimed to compare the interpolation of lead and zinc concentration at the National Lead and Zinc Corporation using Landsat satellite and laboratory data to introduce an optimal interpolation method.
Methods: After collecting the laboratory data, geostatistical approaches were applied to model the spatial distribution of lead and zinc, including radial basis functions, inverse distance weighting, and ordinary kriging (Gaussian, spherical, exponential, and circular). Estimation accuracy was evaluated by cross-validation and MAE, MBE, and RMSE diagnostic statistics.
Results: The Gaussian model had the lowest error and was the optimal method for modeling lead and zinc. After investigating the correlations between the Landsat 5 satellite bands and soil element concentrations, the spatial distribution of lead and zinc was re-zoned in the ArcGIS software. In both methods, estimation accuracy was evaluated by cross-validation and MAE, MBE, and RMSE diagnostic statistics.
Conclusion: The MAE and RMSE of the satellite data of lead were 38.36 and 91.73, while they were 52.93 and 74.57 for zinc, respectively. The experimental data of lead were 53.04 and 125.18while they were 108.15 and 239.25 for zinc, respectively. The accuracy of the satellite data in the interpolation of the investigated elements had lower error and higher accuracy.
Methods: After collecting the laboratory data, geostatistical approaches were applied to model the spatial distribution of lead and zinc, including radial basis functions, inverse distance weighting, and ordinary kriging (Gaussian, spherical, exponential, and circular). Estimation accuracy was evaluated by cross-validation and MAE, MBE, and RMSE diagnostic statistics.
Results: The Gaussian model had the lowest error and was the optimal method for modeling lead and zinc. After investigating the correlations between the Landsat 5 satellite bands and soil element concentrations, the spatial distribution of lead and zinc was re-zoned in the ArcGIS software. In both methods, estimation accuracy was evaluated by cross-validation and MAE, MBE, and RMSE diagnostic statistics.
Conclusion: The MAE and RMSE of the satellite data of lead were 38.36 and 91.73, while they were 52.93 and 74.57 for zinc, respectively. The experimental data of lead were 53.04 and 125.18while they were 108.15 and 239.25 for zinc, respectively. The accuracy of the satellite data in the interpolation of the investigated elements had lower error and higher accuracy.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Environmental Health, Sciences, and Engineering
Received: 2020/09/26 | Accepted: 2020/12/17 | Published: 2020/12/30
Received: 2020/09/26 | Accepted: 2020/12/17 | Published: 2020/12/30
References
1. Cai L, Xu Z, Ren M, Guo Q, Hu X, Hu G, et al. Source Identification of Eight Hazardous Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soils of Huizhou, Guangdong Province, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012; 78: 2-8. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. Mahurpawar M. Effects of Heavy Metals on Human Health. Int J Res Granthaalayah. 2015; 530: 1-7. [Google Scholar]
3. Amirah M, Afiza A, Faizal W, Nurliyana M, Laili S. Human Health Risk Assessment of Metal Contamination Through Consumption of Fish. J Environ Pollut Hum Health. 2013; 1(1): 1-5. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
4. Schwartz G, Eshel G, Ben Dor E. Reflectance Spectroscopy as a Tool for Monitoring Contaminated Soils. Soil Contam. 2011; 6790. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
5. Shi T, Chen Y, Liu Y, Wu G. Visible and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy an Alternative for Monitoring Soil Contamination by Heavy Metals. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 265: 166-76. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
6. Liu M, Liu X, Zhang B, Ding C. Regional Heavy Metal Pollution in Crops by Integrating Physiological Function Variability with Spatio-Temporal Stability Using Multi-Temporal Thermal Remote Sensing. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2016; 51: 91-102. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
7. Teeuw RM. Mapping Hazardous Terrain Using Remote Sensing. England: Geological Society of London; 2007. [Google Scholar]
8. Wang G, Du W, Carranza EJM. Remote Sensing and Gis Prospectivity Mapping for Magmatic-Hydrothermal Base-and Precious-Metal Deposits in the Honghai District, China. J Afr Earth Sci. 2017; 128: 97-115. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
9. Grunwald S, Thompson J, Boettinger J. Digital Soil Mapping and Modeling at Continental Scales: Finding Solutions for Global Issues. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2011; 75(4): 1201-13. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
10. Ferrier G. Application of Imaging Spectrometer Data in Identifying Environmental Pollution Caused by Mining at Rodaquilar, Spain. Remote Sens Environ. 1999; 68(2): 125-37. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. Kemper T, Sommer S. Estimate of Heavy Metal Contamination in Soils after a Mining Accident Using Reflectance Spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36(12): 2742-7. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
12. Choe E, Van der Meer F, Van Ruitenbeek F, Van der Werff H, De Smeth B, Kim KW. Mapping of Heavy Metal Pollution in Stream Sediments Using Combined Geochemistry, Field Spectroscopy, and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: a Case Study of the Rodalquilar Mining Area, Se Spain. Remote Sens Environ. 2008; 112(7): 3222-33. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
13. Anderson K, Croft H. Remote Sensing of Soil Surface Properties. Prog Phys Geogr. 2009; 33(4): 457-73. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
14. Yuan GL, Sun TH, Han P, Li J. Environmental Geochemical Mapping and Multivariate Geostatistical Analysis of Heavy Metals in Topsoils of a Closed Steel Smelter: Capital Iron and Steel Factory, Beijing, China. J Geochem Explor. 2013; 130: 15-21. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
15. Li X, Liu L, Wang Y, Luo G, Chen X, Yang X, et al. Heavy Metal Contamination of Urban Soil in an Old Industrial City (Shenyang) in Northeast China. Geoderma. 2013; 192: 50-8. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
16. Gu YG, Li QS, Fang JH, He BY, Fu HB, Tong ZJ. Identification of Heavy Metal Sources in the Reclaimed Farmland Soils of the Pearl River Estuary in China Using A Multivariate Geostatistical Approach. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014; 105: 7-12. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
17. Uyan M. Determination of Agricultural Soil Index Using Geostatistical Analysis and Gis on Land Consolidation Projects: a Case Study in Konya/Turkey. Comput Electron Agric. 2016; 123: 402-9. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
18. Parizanganeh AH, Bijnavand V, Zamani AA, Hajabolfath A. Concentration, Distribution and Comparison of Total and Bioavailable Heavy Metals in Top Soils of Bonab District in Zanjan Province. Open J Soil Sci. 2012; 2(02): 123. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
19. Khosravi Y, Zamani AA, Parizanganeh AH, Yaftian MR. Assessment of Spatial Distribution Pattern of Heavy Metals Surrounding a Lead and Zinc Production Plant in Zanjan Province, Iran. Geoderma Reg. 2018; 12: 10-7. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
20. Zamani AA. Environmental Analytical Chemistry: Contribution to Studies on Heavy Metals in the Environment. Ph. D. Thesis: Zanjan University. 2012.
21. Zhang X, Lin F, Wong MT, Feng X, Wang K. Identification of Soil Heavy Metal Sources from Anthropogenic Activities and Pollution Assessment of Fuyang County, China. Environ Monit Assess. 2009; 154(1-4): 439. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
22. Cai L, Xu Z, Bao P, He M, Dou L, Chen L, et al. Multivariate and Geostatistical Analyses of the Spatial Distribution and Source of Arsenic and Heavy Metals in the Agricultural Soils in Shunde, Southeast China. J Geochem Explor. 2015; 148: 189-95. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
23. Weidong L, Baret F, Xingfa G, Qingxi T, Lanfen Z, Bing Z. Relating Soil Surface Moisture to Reflectance. Remote Sens Environ. 2002; 81(2-3): 238-46. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
24. Wang F, Gao J, Zha Y. Hyperspectral Sensing of Heavy Metals in Soil and Vegetation: Feasibility and Challenges. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2018; 136: 73-84. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
25. Xiao Y, Gu X, Yin S, Shao J, Cui Y, Zhang Q, et al. Geostatistical Interpolation Model Selection Based on Arcgis and Spatio-Temporal Variability Analysis of Groundwater Level in Piedmont Plains, Northwest China. SpringerPlus. 2016; 5(1): 425. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
26. Harder C. The ArcGIS Book: 10 Big Ideas about Applying Geography to Your World. Esri Press; 2015. [Google Scholar]
27. Belief E. GIS Based Spatial Modeling to Mapping and Estimation Relative Risk of Different Diseases Using Inverse Distance Weighting (Idw) Interpolation Algorithm and Evidential Belief Function (Ebf)(Case Study: Minor Part of Kirkuk City, Iraq). Int J Eng Technol. 2018; 7(4.37): 185-91. [Google Scholar]
28. Xie Y, Chen TB, Lei M, Yang J, Guo QJ, Song B, et al. Spatial Distribution of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution Estimated by Different Interpolation Methods: Accuracy and Uncertainty Analysis. Chemosphere. 2011; 82(3): 468-76. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
29. Aguilar FJ, Agüera F, Aguilar MA, Carvajal F. Effects of Terrain Morphology, Sampling Density, and Interpolation Methods on Grid Dem Accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 2005; 71(7): 805-16. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
30. Arslan H. Estimation of Spatial Distrubition of Groundwater Level and Risky Areas of Seawater Intrusion on the Coastal Region in Çarşamba Plain, Turkey, Using Different Interpolation Methods. Environ Monit Assess. 2014; 186(8): 5123-34. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
31. Webster R, Oliver MA. Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. England: John Wiley and Sons; 2007. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
32. Parizanganeh A, Hajisoltani P, Zamani A. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Surficial Soils Surrounding Zinc Industrial Complex in Zanjan-Iran. Procedia Environ Sci. 2010; 2: 162-6. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
33. Mehes Smith M, Nkongolo K, Narendrula R, Cholewa E. Mobility of Heavy Metals in Plants and Soil: a Case Study from a Mining Region in Canada. Am J Environ Sci. 2013; 9(6): 483-93. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
© 2024 The Author(s)
