Thu, Mar 27, 2025
[Archive]
.png)
Volume 6, Issue 4 (12-2020)
jhehp 2020, 6(4): 167-172 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jebellijavan A, Emadi Chashmi S H, Staji H, Akhlaghi H. Comparison of the Culture and PCR Methods to Determine th Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pullorum Isolated from Chicken Thigh Samples in Semnan, Iran. jhehp 2020; 6 (4) :167-172
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-342-en.html
URL: http://jhehp.zums.ac.ir/article-1-342-en.html
1- Department of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
2- Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
3- Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
4- DVM Student of Veterinary Medicine (D. V. M), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
2- Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
3- Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
4- DVM Student of Veterinary Medicine (D. V. M), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
Abstract: (6914 Views)
Background: Helicobacter pullorum is among the most frequently reported pathogens in poultry. The present study aimed to compare the culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods to assess the prevalence of H. pullorum isolated from chicken tight samples in Semnan, Iran. The antibiotic resistance pattern of the H. pullorum isolates was also determined for the first time in Iran.
Methods: In total, 50 chicken thigh samples were collected from the local retail markets in Semnan city during January-September 2019. The samples were examined using the culture method and biochemical tests, and the final confirmation was based on PCR with the 16S rRNA gene. In addition, antibiotic resistance test was performed using the disc-diffusion method.
Results: According to the culture method and biochemical tests, 12 samples (24%) were positive for H. pullorum, eight of which (16%) showed H. pullorum in PCR as well and resistance against nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin. On the other hand, the lowest antimicrobial resistance was observed against colistin, chloramphenicol, and fosfomycin.
Conclusion: Our promising findings indicated that PCR based on the 16S rRNA gene may be a valuable and sensitive approach to the detection of H. pullorum in chicken meat.
Methods: In total, 50 chicken thigh samples were collected from the local retail markets in Semnan city during January-September 2019. The samples were examined using the culture method and biochemical tests, and the final confirmation was based on PCR with the 16S rRNA gene. In addition, antibiotic resistance test was performed using the disc-diffusion method.
Results: According to the culture method and biochemical tests, 12 samples (24%) were positive for H. pullorum, eight of which (16%) showed H. pullorum in PCR as well and resistance against nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin. On the other hand, the lowest antimicrobial resistance was observed against colistin, chloramphenicol, and fosfomycin.
Conclusion: Our promising findings indicated that PCR based on the 16S rRNA gene may be a valuable and sensitive approach to the detection of H. pullorum in chicken meat.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Food Safety and Hygiene
Received: 2020/10/4 | Accepted: 2020/12/29 | Published: 2020/12/30
Received: 2020/10/4 | Accepted: 2020/12/29 | Published: 2020/12/30
References
1. Javed K, Gul F, Abbasi R, Zaidi RA, Noreen Z, Bokhari H, et al. Prevalence and Role of Type Six Secretion System in Pathogenesis of Emerging Zoonotic Pathogen Helicobacter pullorum from Retail Poultry. Avian Pathol. 2019; 48(6): 557-63. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
2. Ekli R, Adzitey F, Huda N. Prevalence of Resistant Salmonella spp. Isolated from Raw Meat and Liver of Cattle in the Wa Municipality of Ghana. IOP Conf Ser Earth: Environ Sci. 2019; 287(1): 012006. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
3. Jennings JL, Sait LC, Perrett CA, Foster C, Williams LK, Humphrey TJ, et al. Campylobacter jejuni Is Associated with, but not Sufficient to Cause Vibrionic Hepatitis in Chickens. Vet Microbiol. 2011; 149(1): 193–9. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
4. Wai SS, Abdul Aziz S, Bitrus AA, Zunita Z, Abu J. Helicobacter pullorum in Broiler Chickens and the Farm Environment: A One Health Approach. Int J One Heal. 2019; 5(3): 20–5. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
5. Sabzevari A, Kouchaki Penchah H, Nabavi Pelesaraei A. Investigation of Life Cycle Assessment of Hazelnut Production in Guilan Province of I.R. Iran Based on Orchards Size Levels. Biol Forum. 2015; 7(1): 807–13. [Google Scholar]
6. Qumar S, Majid M, Kumar N, Tiwari SK, Semmler T, Devi S, et al. Cross Genome Dynamics and Molecular Resistant Helicobacter pullorum Isolates Obtained from Broiler and Free-Range Chickens in India. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017; 83(1): e02305-16. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
7. Borges V, Santos A, Correia CB, Saraiva M, Ménard A, Vieira L, et al. Helicobacter pullorum Isolated from Fresh Chicken Meat: Antibiotic Resistance and Genomic Traits of an Emerging Foodborne Pathogen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015; 81(23): 8155–63. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
8. Stanley J, Linton D, Burnes AP, Dewhirt FE, On SLW, Porter A, et al. Helicobacter pullorum sp. nov. Genotype and Phenotype of a New Species Isolated from Poultry and from Human Patients with Gastroenteritis. Microbiol. 1994; 140(12): 3441–9. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
9. Steinbrueckner B, Haerter G, Pelz K, Weiner S, Rump J, Deissler W, et al. Isolation of Helicobacter pullorum from Patients with Enteritis. Scandina J Infect Disease. 1997; 29(3): 315–8. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
10. Bohr URM, Glasbrenner B, Primus A, Zagoura A, Wex T, Malfertheiner P. Identification of Enterohepatic Helicobacter Species in Patients Suffering from Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(6): 2766–8. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. Laharie D, Asencio C, Asselineau J, Bulois P, Bourreille A, Moreau J, et al. Association between Entero-Hepatic Helicobacter Species and Crohn’s Disease: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 30(3): 283–93. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
12. Mohamed M, Ragab I, Shahata M, EI Refaie M. Helicobacter pullorum Among Poultry in ASSIUT-Egypt: Genetic Characterization, Virolence and MIC. Int J Poult Sci. 2010; 9(6): 521–6. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
13. Zanoni RG, Rossi M, Giacomucci D, Sanguinetti V, Manfreda G. Occurrence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Helicobacter pullorum from Broiler Chickens and Commercial Laying Hens in Italy. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007; 116(1): 168–73. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
14. Ceelen L, Decostere A, Verschraegen G, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F. Prevalence of Helicobacter pullorum Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Disease and Clinically Healthy Persons. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(6): 2984–6. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
15. González A, Piqueres P, Moreno Y, Cañigral I, Owen RJ, Hernández J, et al. A Novel Real-Time PCR Assay for the Detection of Helicobacter pullorum-Like Organisms in Chicken Products. Int Microbio. 2008; 11(3): 203-8. [Google Scholar]
16. Jaja IF, Oguttu J, Green E, Muchenje V. Prevalence and Distribution of Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants of Escherichia coli Isolates Obtained from Meat in South Africa. Plos One. 2019; 15(5): e0216914. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
17. Shah PM, Schäfer V, Knothe H. Medical and Veterinary Use of Antimicrobial Agents: Implications for Public Health. A Clinician’s View on Antimicrobial Resistance. Vet Microbiol. 1993; 35(3-4): 269–74. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
18. Roth N, Kaesbohrer A, Mayrhofer S, Zitz U, Hofacre C, Domig K. The Application of Antibiotics in Broiler Production and the Resulting Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli : A Global Overview. Poult Sci. 2019; 98(4):1791-804. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
19. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 10272-1. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs: Horizontal Method for Detection and Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. Part I: Detection Method. Int Stand, Geneva: Switzerland; 2006.
20. Bello N, Francino O, Sánchez A. Isolation of Genomic DNA from Feathers. J Vet Diagnostic Investig. 2001; 13(2): 162–4. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
21. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria; Proposed Guidelines; CLSI Document M45. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne PA, USA. 2015; 35.
22. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 27th ed. CLSI Supplement M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne PA, USA; 2017.
23. Behroo S, Javadi A, Rad MG. Helicobacter pullorum Prevalence in Patients with Gastroenteritis in Humans and Chicken in the Province of Ardabil in 2014. Indian J Fundam Appl Life Sci. 2015; 5(2): 87–94.
24. Matsuda M, Moore JE. Urease-Positive Thermophilic Campylobacter Species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70(8): 4415–8. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
25. Fox JG, Chien CC, Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ, Shen Z, Melito PL, et al. Helicobacter canadensis sp. nov. Isolated from Humans with Diarrhea as an Example of an Emerging Pathogen. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38(7): 2546–9. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
26. Zanoni RG, Piva S, Rossi M, Pasquali F, Lucchi A, De Cesare A, et al. Occurrence of Helicobacter pullorum in Turkeys. Vet Microbiol. 2011; 149(3–4): 492–6. [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
27. Jamshidi A, Bassami RM, Salami H, Mohammadi S. Isolation and Identification of Helicobacter pullorum from Caecal Content of Broiler Chickens in Mashhad, Iran. Iran J Vet Res. 2014; 15(2):179–82. [Google Scholar]
28. Kahraman BB, Seyyal AK. Investigation of Helicobacter pullorum Occurence in Chicken in the Marmara Region of Turkey. Istanbul Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2013; 39(1): 63–6. [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
© 2024 The Author(s)
